Farm Incomes Take Another Dip in 2017

Farm Income Takes a Dip in 2017

Minnesota farmers experienced their fifth consecutive year of low profitability in 2017. The median farm earned $28,551, down slightly from just over $36,000 in 2016.  Declines in farm income were largely driven by low profits and losses for cash crop farms, while livestock farms, in general, had a better year.  With average investment of over $2 million, farms earned a 2.2% return on investment. Across all farm types, almost one-third of farms lost net worth in 2017.

Those are among key findings in the annual farm income analysis conducted by University of Minnesota Extension and Minnesota State in collaboration with the FINPACK Team and the Center for Farm Financial Management (CFFM). The analysis used data from 2,164 participants in the Minnesota State Farm Business Management programs and 104 members of the Southwest Minnesota Farm Business Management Association. Participating producers represent approximately 10 percent of commercial farmers in Minnesota.  CFFM’s work with projects like this provide the benchmarking metrics used in FINPACK.

Median Net Farm Income for Minnesota farms in FINBIN - 2017 Data

Median Net Farm Income for Minnesota farms in FINBIN (2017 data)

Crop farms: Another big crop does not improve profits

For the third consecutive year, Minnesota farmers produced bumper crops of Minnesota’s primary cash crops, corn, and soybeans. But as has been the case each year, high yields did not produce high profits. The median crop farm earned $23,722, down from $46,831 in 2016.

Corn yields for these farms topped 200 bushels for the second year in a row, up almost 20% from the previous 10-year average. Soybean yields were not quite as good, averaging 48 bushels per acre but still 7% above the previous 10-year average. Large crops across the corn-belt as well as internationally have increased grain stockpiles and pushed prices below cost of production for a substantial number of producers.  Corn prices averaged $3.25 per bushel for sales by these producers in 2017 after topping $7.00 per bushel just 5 years ago. The average producer lost almost ($25) on each acre of corn produced on rented cropland. Soybeans were a little better, with the average acre contributing $28 to farm profits. 

Yet, on average, balance sheets for crop producers remain relatively strong. The average crop producer’s earned net worth (excluding changes in asset values) increased by over $28,000. That increase, however, includes a contribution of almost $40,000 from off farm income. Working capital levels, which have been the savior of many of these farms throughout the current downturn, decreased by almost $28,000, but remained at a relatively strong 35% of average farm gross revenue.

 “It seems like a lot of producers have been treading water these last few years, waiting for something to happen to improve prices,” according to Aaron Brudelie, a farm management instructor from Minnesota West Community college. “We’ve seen a little pop in prices this last few weeks, with production problems in South America. That has given producers a chance to sell some 2017 crops at a profit as well as a chance to lock in a little better price for some of their 2018 crop. We have a long way to go, but crop farmers are a little more optimistic about this next year.”

Mixed results for livestock producers

Profits were up for each of Minnesota’s major types of livestock operations, dairy, pork and beef production. Still the median producer earned only $32,800 from farm operations for the year. Hog producers had a big turn-around, after many lost money on pig production in 2016. For dairy and beef producers, however, profits remained at low levels by historical standards.

The median earnings for dairy farms was almost $50,000, up from $31,500 in 2016. Yet, dairy farms are seemingly under the most financial stress across the state right now. “2017 was really a tale of two halves,” said Nate Converse of Central Lakes College. “For the first six months, we had relatively profitable prices, but the bottom fell out in the second half. Right now, many of the dairy producers I work with are losing $2 per hundredweight produced and the outlook does not look much better for 2018.”  

The average dairy farm made $370 per cow, up from $135 in 2016.  Milk producers received $17.94 per hundred pounds of milk (cwt), while production costs averaged $17.24. However, currently most producers are receiving under $15.50 per cwt.

Pork producers were the only farms that as a group, had a profitable year in 2017. The median earnings for hog farms was just over $122,000 after losing almost ($5,000) in 2016. Pork producers received almost 55 cents per pound produced, up from just under 50 cents in 2016. The average farm made about $11 per head finished. Prospects for 2018 are cloudy, according to Purdue economist Chris Hurt. Much depends on feed cost which are now inching up, again because of corn production problems in South America.

The median beef farm among this group of farmers lost money for the third consecutive year, netting a farm loss of ($3,800) in 2017 compared to a loss of almost ($12,000) in 2016. Enterprise returns, however, were much better. Cow-calf producers made about $17 per cow in 2017 after losing ($83) per cow in 2016.  Cattle finishers, those who buy calves from cow-calf producers and raise them to market weight, made $137 per head, after losing ($77) last year.  Cattle futures prices do not provide much optimism for improved profits for the beef sector in 2018.

Financial stress across the industry

Most Minnesota farmers are still in reasonably good shape financially, even after five years of low earnings. The average farm’s debt to asset ratio is still sound, at 34%, up only 3 percent from the end of the high profit years of 2007 to 2012.  Working capital has declined from $440,000 to $205,000 over that five year period.  “Minnesota farmers came into this downturn with very strong balance sheets,” says Dale Nordquist, an economist with the University of Minnesota’s Center for Farm Financial Management. “But we are seeing increased financial stress across Minnesota agriculture. Like any industry, every farm has a different cost structure and some farms are doing better than others. It is nothing like the financial crisis of the 80’s, but there is a lot of slow bleeding going on out there. It becomes a crisis for some individual farms who don’t have a strong enough balance sheet to withstand this extended downturn.”

The statewide results are compiled by the Center for Farm Financial Management into the FINBIN database, which can be queried at www.finbin.umn.edu.  FINBIN is one of the largest and most accessible sources of farm financial and production benchmark information in the world.  FINBIN places detailed reports on whole farm, crop, and livestock financials at your fingertips.  2017 data will continue to be added this spring from other collaborating states, including Illinois, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, and Wisconsin.